| 英文摘要 |
Relevant revisions to the Military Trial Law have caused major changes in military trials. And with last year's revision of the Armed Forces Disciplinary Punishment Act and a new law on the Servicemember Relief Act, military personnel may have more specific protections for their public duties and litigation rights. The formulation of laws cannot be done behind closed doors to easily obtain appropriate content. If there are foreign legal systems worthy of reference, the research and analysis of this legal system can make the above two laws more perfect. Germany has defense discipline regulations regarding military disciplinary violations, and has a defense duty court, a military duty tribunal, and an honorary judge mechanism that are dedicated to hearing disciplinary violations by military personnel. This article first introduces the general handling provisions of the Ordinance and analyzes the applicable principles for its operation. The main ones include the principle of speedy trial and equal punishment. Secondly, the structure and composition of the defense duty tribunal are introduced. It also explains its construction content, jurisdiction, chief group system, honorary judge selection and appointment system, etc. with this. This article attempts to elaborate on the construction of military trials for disciplinary violations that focus on military interests, hoping to obtain relevant references for our military trials, so as to promote the research and discussion of the Armed Forces Disciplinary Punishment Act and the Servicemember Relief Act, and even for the future inspiration from the Criminal Code of the Armed Forces and its trials. |