| 英文摘要 |
Present study uses texts of key audit matters (KAMs) in auditors’reports from 2016 to 2020 to explore whether the auditor busyness undermines the communicative value of KAMs. Using text mining analysis, we measure two KAM characteristics: readability and specificity. We find that the busier the auditors, the more readable the KAMs, i.e., the shorter the content and the lower frequency in using jargon. We also find that busy auditors provide more specific information in KAMs. Our empirical results suggest that auditor workload does not undermine the communicative value of KAMs in current regulatory settings. |