| 英文摘要 |
This study investigates the relationship between the proportion of female board members and corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance on firm outcomes, using a panel of listed firms in Taiwan from 2017 to 2023. Applying fixed and random effects regressions, structural equation modeling (SEM), moderation analysis, and two-stage least squares (2SLS), we explore both direct and interactive effects on accounting-based performance (ROA, ROE) and market-based valuation (Tobin’s Q). Empirical findings show that female board representation significantly enhances ROA and ROE but negatively correlates with Tobin’s Q, suggesting persistent skepticism in the capital market regarding gender diversity. ESG performance does not mediate the relationship between board gender diversity and firm performance, although it positively influences Tobin’s Q. Moderation analysis reveals a significant negative interaction between ESG and female board ratio on ROA and ROE, indicating diminishing marginal returns from board diversity when ESG investment increases. After correcting for endogeneity using lagged ESG scores as instruments, female board ratio exhibits significant negative effects across all performance metrics. These results highlight that while gender diversity may hold long-term governance potential, its short-term impact in the Taiwanese context is shaped by institutional readiness, market perceptions, and governance capacity. Policy frameworks should move beyond quota mandates and prioritize ESG literacy and board competency. Firms are advised to evaluate gender-ESG synergies cautiously to balance performance, market expectations, and sustainable value creation. |