建構公私協力關係中保障公共性之途徑：以新北市國民運動中心為例   全文下載

Ensuring Publicness in the Public-Private Partnership: A Case Study of National Sports Center in New Taipei City

我國公私協力受惠於促進民間參與公共建設法的通過，讓公私協力的應用範圍相當廣泛。然而，儘管公私協力的相關文獻眾多，並認為公共性為公私協力的重要特質甚至是基本要件，但是公共性屬於抽象的概念，加上其沒有一致的定義，導致過去文獻少有相關研究。因此，在文獻長期忽略公私協力公共性的情況下，不禁使筆者好奇公私協力關係中涉及的公共性目的為何？在公私協力關係的運作過程中可確保公私協力公共性的手段有哪些？本文將以新北市國民運動中心為例來分析公私協力的公共性目的，並建構出未來在推行公私協力時可保障公共性的途徑。
本研究發現法律規範與契約、回應利害關係人的期待與行為及符合組織願景與使命等三種方式，可作為保障公私協力公共性的手段。除此之外，本研究亦發現公私協力的過程，或許可透過公益活動達成推廣及宣傳效果，提升整體的商業利益。作者認為未來若欲進一步保障公私協力的公共性，在公私協力的法律規範與契約中應賞罰分明，積極創造私部門保障公共性的正面誘因。

Taiwanese public-private partnership (PPP) has benefited from the legislation of a law that encourages extensive application of public-private partnership. Relevant literature abounds with research on public-private partnership, and publicness is considered as an important characteristic or even a basic requirement of public-private partnership, but publicness is an ambiguous concept and has no clear definition, an issue that has rarely been dealt with. Since our country has neglected the publicness of public-private partnership for a long time, the author can’t help but wonder what is the public purpose of public-private partnership? What are the means to ensure the publicness of public-private partnership in the process of its implementation? This article takes the National Sports Center in New Taipei City as an example to analyze the public purpose of public-private partnership and seek a way to ensure publicness when promoting public-private partnership in the future.
This study finds that legal norms, responding to the expectations and requirements of stakeholders and conforming to the vision and mission of the organization, can be used as means to protect the publicness of public-private partnership. In addition, this study finds that in the process of public-private partnership, it may be possible to enhance the overall commercial interests through the promotional and publicity effects of public welfare activities. The author believes that if we want to further protect the publicness of public-private partnership in the future, we should clearly distinguish rewards and punishments in the legal norms of public-private partnership, and actively create positive incentives for the private sector to protect publicness.