| 英文摘要 |
This study explores the crucial role that school desks and chairs played in materializing modern education in Taiwan under Japanese colonial rule, focusing on their use in kōgakkō─public elementary schools primarily attended by Taiwanese children. By examining the interplay between educational ideals, furniture design, school administration, and student health, this research underscores how classroom furniture helped shape the everyday experiences of colonial schooling. The rise of modern schooling in Taiwan was characterized by mass education, which required standardized spatial arrangements. Classrooms were organized with blackboards and podiums at the front and rows of forward-facing desks and chairs, facilitating the disciplinary order essential to collective instruction. This marked a sharp contrast with the informal, often improvised furnishings of traditional sishu (private schools), where students typically brought their own desks and stools. Beginning in 1896, alongside the establishment of Japanese-language training institutes, the colonial government introduced standardized desks and chairs in 1896. While Japan experimented with multifunctional school furniture in the early 1900s, a simpler model─a double desk paired with two separate chairs─became standard in Taiwan’s public elementary schools. As enrollment increased, local furniture workshops emerged to meet the increasing demand. Health concerns, especially those related to posture and body height, also influenced furniture design. The Government-General of Taiwan conducted body height surveys in 1903 and 1942 to determine appropriate desk and chair dimensions. Although not officially mandated, many schools adopted furniture in multiple sizes to accommodate students’physical differences. Drawing on archival documents, photographs, and school reports, this study traces the development of school furniture in colonial Taiwan and argues that desks and chairs were more than mere functional objects; they were material expressions of modern pedagogical ideals. As instruments that structured collective learning and embodied discipline, they offer valuable insights into how educational spaces were conceived, managed, and experienced within the colonial context. |