國際關係政治心理學的發展挑戰與回應：國際關係「情緒轉向」的觀察

The Challenges and Responses of Political Psychology in International Relations: On the“Emotional Turn”

1970~1990年代，政治心理學就已運用於國際關係研究，但2000年起的「情緒轉向」賦予「國際政治心理學」復興的意義與影響，包括學者之間不同觀點的辯論、議題研究的實務價值、國際心理學科際整合研究的發展趨勢與挑戰，以及此轉向對整體國關研究的影響等等，都展現「情緒轉向」正重新帶動國際政治心理學的新進展，遂成為觀察此新進展的關鍵櫥窗，藉由此觀察論析其發展的挑戰與回應。
第壹部分探討國關研究的「情緒轉向」與政治心理學發展，藉以顯現國關學者應用政治心理學為研究途徑於相關領域及議題的研究歷程。第貳部分檢視「情緒研究」在此歷程中的發展，呈現國關學者以理性計算國家利益，長期忽略政治心理學研究；學者遂提出更多的研究成果引起「情緒轉向」，重新關注情緒對國關研究的影響，促使國際政治心理學復興。第參、肆及伍部分探討提倡「情緒轉向」的學者藉由國家情緒理論化、關鍵概念的再概念化及方法論與研究法的反思等三面向，復興國際政治心理學的研究。第陸、柒及捌部分探索「情緒轉向」所引起國際政治心理學在本體論、知識論、情緒理性概念化、研究議題及學科社群發展等面向的挑戰與回應。

From 1970s to 1990s, Political Psychology has applied to International Relations, but only since 2000, the“emotional turn”empowered International Political Psychology the meaning of revival and impacts. Including the debates between scholars with different perspectives (ontology, epistemology, methodology, and research methods), the practice values of issues study, interdisciplinary trends and challenges of International Political Psychology, and the impacts of“emotional turn”. All demonstrate the“emotional turn”is reinvigorating the progress of International Political Psychology, it will be the“eyes of windows”to the progress for analyzing.
Firstly, this paper explore the development of“emotional turn”and Political Psychology in International Relations to demonstrate the processing of scholars applied Political Psychology as approach to study the fields and issues. Secondly, reviewing the“emotional turn”in the processing to show the chronic neglect to emotion study by taking the rational calculating for national interests. Thirdly, exploring the works(articles and books) of scholars to show they has brought the“emotional turn”, and reinvigorate the impacts of emotions in International Relations, and the revival of International Political Psychology. Separately, to explore scholars by way of“theorization of national emotions”,“reconceptualization of key concepts”, and“reflections on methodology, research methods and issues”to revival International Political Psychology. Finally, explore the challenges and responses of ontology, epistemology, conceptualization of emotional rationality, and the discipline community.