| 英文摘要 |
Approximately eight thousand women are killed or burned to death annually due to insufficient dowry in India. The first author, with over two decades of experience in counseling perpetrators of domestic violence, introduced regional and national risk classification prevention programs in 2005, demonstrating a tangible reduction in reporting. There is a curiosity about whether these initiatives can be integrated with improvement proposals suggested by Indian scholars. With 80% of the Indian population practicing Hinduism and 60% of the Taiwanese population adhering to Buddhism, this paper aims to compare the gender equality concepts in Hinduism and Buddhism and explore feasible future interventions. Research reveals that Hinduism originated around 1500 BCE from the invasion of Central Asian nomadic people, the Aryans, who brought Brahmanism and eradicated the egalitarian culture of the Indus Valley, ultimately establishing a caste system for governance. Male priests, capable of communicating with gods, gradually authored scriptures promoting male supremacy, and officials concurred. Consequently, the status of women declined to a subordinate position, limited to reproductive and household duties, with even religious activities being prohibited. Around 500 BCE, Buddha advocated for the equality of all sentient beings. During the Maurya Empire, Emperor Ashoka promoted Buddhism, while the subsequent Gupta Dynasty witnessed the resurgence of Hinduism. Notably, within Hinduism, the Manusmriti, a legal code, mandates a wife's duty to serve her husband as if serving a deity. In contrast, Buddhism, from the time of Buddha, promoted the equality of all sentient beings and accepted the ordination of women, although the Eight Respectful Laws stipulate that nuns should show deference to monks and refrain from mentioning their faults, leading to dissatisfaction among female monastics domestically. Drawing on multicultural social work principles that emphasize equal respect for diverse cultures, the author proposes the 'First Third Helps the Last Third Method.' This involves identifying the first third of counties and townships to assist those in the last third, gradually fostering nationwide improvement, based on the notion that the community serves as a resource oasis. |