| 英文摘要 |
Muscle strength, muscle mass, pennation angle, and fascicle length influence the performance of athletes and are also relevant to the functional performance and health of the general public. Long-term resistance training effectively improves muscle strength, promotes muscle hypertrophy, and increases the pennation angle and fascicle length. However, the effects of training may be partially or completely lost due to detraining. Eccentric resistance training is believed to elicit different physiological responses after detraining compared to concentric or traditional resistance training, due to the specificity of muscle contraction patterns in response to physiological stimuli. Therefore, the aim of this study was to summarize the effects of detraining of traditional, eccentric and concentric resistance training on muscle strength, muscle mass, and muscle fiber architecture. This paper summarizes the relevant literature and shows that eccentric resistance training may be more beneficial to the preservation of muscle strength (especially eccentric and isometric strength) and muscle mass than traditional and concentric resistance training; however, the training effects on muscle fiber structure are still inconsistent due to the great variability in experimental design and the scarcity of the literature. In conclusion, it is suggested that eccentric contraction is an essential component of a resistance training program to preserve training adaptations. |