| 英文摘要 |
Village is the basic tier of Taiwan’s local self-government. Nearly 8,000 chiefs of village all over Taiwan are the elected officials serving people in the forefront. However, there is still an even smaller administrative unit called neighborhood within villages. Compared to the rich academic work on the chiefs of village, we seem to have rarely seen any research interest on the heads of neighborhood. We contend that without the knowledge of how chiefs of village and heads of neighborhood interact, we cannot piece together the whole image of Taiwan’s local self-government. Thus, as a preliminary attempt, this paper aims to clarify the relationship between chiefs of village and heads of neighborhood from both institutional and practical aspect. Furthermore, we try to propose a theoretical framework, from the perspective of efficiency, legitimacy, and social networks, showing how chiefs of village consider in selecting his or her heads of neighborhood. Lastly, we deduce hypotheses from the proposed theoretical framework and test them empirically. The major findings are as follows: first, although the local governments have the right to regulate how heads of neighborhood are generated, the chiefs of village are still the primary actors responsible for recruiting their heads of neighborhood. Secondly, through the testing of research hypotheses, we found, as our theory expects, that efficiency, legitimacy, and social networks are all major aspects affecting the decision of the chiefs of village to recruit their heads of neighborhood. |