| 英文摘要 |
This paper revisits Noelle-Neumann’s Spiral of Silence theory, proposed in 1972, and identifies areas that need enhancement in the context of the contemporary information environment. By utilizing the Quasi-Statistical Organ from the theory, the study establishes a more suitable analytical framework for modern public opinion research. The following questions are explored. (1) How does the Quasi-Statistical Organ operate within the new media environment? (2) How can data be collected according to the logic of the Quasi-Statistical Organ? (3) Can observation methods designed based on the Quasi-Statistical Organ predict emerging popular topics? The literature is divided into three sections: Theoretical Gaps Due to Changes in Media Environment, Social Cues in the New Media Environment, and New Research Approaches Combining New Media Opinion Climate and Corpus Methods. First, the strand of Theoretical Gaps Due to Changes in Media Environment explores domestic and international studies on the application of the Spiral of Silence theory. It finds that changes in the information environment have enabled audiences to exhibit more diverse responses. Whereas in the past, audiences could only speculate in interviews whether they would express their political choices to strangers on a train or participate in opinion polls, today, they can obtain social cues from various sources. Notably, the process of browsing social media allows audiences to piece together aggregate user representations (AURs), enabling them to imagine the majority opinion and decide whether to express their own views or subtly blend into AUR (Walther & Jang, 2012). Audiences now have more agency in the formation of opinion climate. More importantly, the behavior of detecting opinion climates through AUR helps researchers clarify the operation of the Quasi-Statistical Organ, a principle previously unexplained in the Spiral of Silence theory, in the contemporary media environment. Second, the section Social Cues in the New Media Environment examines how, in different information environments, do proprietor content (PC), aggregate user representations (AURs), and user-generated content (UGC) constitute social cues from the audience’s perspective. Lastly, the part New Research Approaches Combining New Media Opinion Climate and Corpus Methods reviews research on public opinion to determine if there are methodological limitations, such as initiating studies from individual cases or topics, that could miss unanticipated research outcomes due to top-down research designs. This study argues that incorporating corpus methods, which include audience behavior of collecting opinion climates using AUR, into the data collection process and establishing a continuously updating research framework through linguistic probes align researchers’perspectives more closely with those of the audience. This study selects the Gossip Board of PTT.cc, Taiwan’s most popular bulletin board system, as the data source, using the aggregate user representations (AUR) accessible to users as the data collection standard. It collects data from January to June 2022 on PTT’s Gossip Board, specifically targeting posts that (1) have a net positive score (upvotes minus downvotes) greater than 100 and (2) have titles containing“Re: [新聞]”(Re: [News]), including any associated comments. The collected data comprise 651 posts and 319,876 comments. The data are organized and analyzed using the Chinese corpus analysis tool CORPRO. The criterion of selecting posts with a net positive score greater than 100 ensures that these posts are marked as“爆!”(explosive), making them more visible to users. Additionally, the requirement that the title contains“Re: [新聞]”indicates that the content is reposted news that has been brought back for discussion. This behavior is akin to audiences simultaneously looking towards the public domain and the community, receiving public news information, and then sharing it with others who should see it. This thought process closely aligns with the intuitive way audiences gauge others’opinions on issues, as described in the Quasi-Statistical Organ. Moreover, the study builds upon Johansen’s (2017) method of using corpora to identify specific function words in the form1-to-function-to-form2 approach in probe studies, allowing researchers to continuously update probes when identifying emerging opinion climates. The results of this paper establish a sustainable and topic-independent opinion analysis framework. First, the word frequency of a large number of comments is calculated. Second, replies to less popular posts are collected and subjected to keyness calculation to identify which words appear exclusively in popular posts. This set of words serves as probes capable of extracting the opinion climate. Third, articles containing these probes are searched over the following week, revealing the opinion climate currently under heated discussion. The research findings note that the analytical framework built using probes is indeed effective when applied to the six months of data collected herein. The purpose of this study is to address gaps in the description of the Quasi-Statistical Organ principle within the Spiral of Silence theory and to establish an opinion climate analysis framework that transcends time and topics, thus aligning closer to the perspectives of online community members. The primary research contributions include outlining the operational principles of the Quasi-Statistical Organ in the contemporary media environment and proposing a novel analytical framework for opinion climate analysis. This paper first addresses the deficiencies in the Spiral of Silence theory by outlining the operational principles of the Quasi-Statistical Organ in the current media environment and then presents a new, sustainable framework for opinion climate analysis that extends beyond predetermined research boundaries. Based on this paper, future research can explore comparative studies on other platforms or serve as a reference for information literacy research. The limitations of this study include the inability to cover the impact of other social media interfaces and the inability to exclude any influences of some extreme cases on the overall data. |