| 英文摘要 |
In 1999, a section on travel contracts was added to the Civil Code in order to clarify the legal relationship and the rights and obligations of tour operators and tourists. Article 514-8 of the Civil Code states that tourists can claim monetary compensation for wasted time. There is no explicit recognition of time wastage as a subject of compensation in tort or contract law. This article uses No. 1115 Civil Judgement (2015) of the Taiwan High Court as a guiding case to analyze the legislative reasons, doctrines and practical opinions from the perspective of the nature of damage and the object of compensation, and to specify the problems encountered in the application and calculation of Article 514-8 of the Civil Code. The purpose of a travel contract is to relieve the physical and mental interests of the tourist, and the nature of travel is such that it must be accompanied by the passage of the tourist's time, and the non-fulfilment of the contract will cause mental anguish to the tourist in terms of time wasted, which is special. This article is a special provision for claiming compensation for non-pecuniary damages for“relief of physical and mental interests”, which takes precedence over Article 227-1 of the Civil Code. As regards the calculation of the amount of compensation, under the current law, the maximum amount of compensation is based on the average daily amount of the total cost of the journey, which is in conflict with the function of the compensation. It should be calculated in the same way as the general compensation, depending on the extent of the defect, the purpose of the travel, the actual length of time wasted, the responsibility of the obligor and other specific circumstances. |