台灣訴願法制之更迭及其實踐比較（1923-1949）

本文係探討台灣在1900至1949年曾逐步推行兩種國別訴願法制，即1923至1945年台灣總督府施行的日本帝國議會制訂的「訴願法」與勒令「訴願法ヲ台灣ニ施行スルノ件（大正11年3月28日）」，及1945年中華民國政府續行的「訴願法」。從兩國法制的探源與歷史法制比較，進而明瞭兩者的異同。另本文利用國史館典藏之《台灣省行政長官公署檔案》，加上政府之出版品、公報等，來探討戰後初期訴願業務的接收，以明國民政府如何進行訴願業務接收，期瞭解台灣訴願制度在政權轉換過程中之經歷及其處境。

This article begins with studying two different types of c Administrative Appeal Act carried out in Taiwan from 1923 to 1949“The Administrative Appeal Act has been implemented in Taiwan.”and“Administrative Appeal Act(Japan)”, the two were announced by Governor-General of Taiwan(Taiwan Sōtokufu) in 1923 to 1945. From 1945 to 1949, another one laws,“Administrative Appeal Act(ROC)”were made by the Nationalist Government in 1930.This paper will explore origin of the law-making and make a comparison of the regulations. This paper uses“the Archives of the Office of the Provincial Government of Taiwan,”and many other publications and gazettes, etc., so as to show a clear picture of how the National Government to conduct Administrative Appeal takeover, It is expected to understand experiences and situations of Administrative Appeal Act in the process of time change and regime change.