| 英文摘要 |
Despite their different motivating factors, recently in the U.S. corporate governance practices, institutional investors and retail investors increasingly participate in the corporate governance of US companies, and the participation further affect the development of US corporate law. Such phenomenon prompts us to reconsider the legitimate basis of directors’ruling authority in corporate management. Referring to the deliberative democracy theory in the political philosophy, this article argues the basis of directors’authority should not merely be based on the exercise of shareholder franchise. Rather, directors should also engage in deliberation with shareholders to establish the internal legitimacy of their corporate decisions within the corporation. In addition, when directors’decisions will affect stakeholders, the directors should also engage in deliberation with the affected stakeholders to gain external legitimacy. Based on the discussions above, this article further reviews the sequential corporate governance roadmaps brought by the agency-in-charge and explores the boundary of corporate powers between the shareholders’meeting and the board meeting from the perspective of the deliberative democracy theory. |