| 英文摘要 |
This article focuses on discussing how company groups govern their subsidiaries in practical operations, under what circumstances a controlling company may be recognized as a de facto or shadow director of its subsidiary, and the responsibilities that arise if the controlling company is deemed a de facto or shadow director. It points out that to effectively pursue the responsibilities of de facto or shadow directors in practice, there must be comprehensive supporting measures, which may involve relevant legislative amendments. The article suggests that information regarding company groups governance should be more transparent. In addition to improving the information in annual reports, the scope of information obtained under the Inspector System should also consider the operational needs of company groups, allowing shareholders of both the controlling company and subsidiaries opportunities to access cross-company information within necessary limits. Furthermore, considering the important role of employees in corporate governance, it is recommended to ensure the establishment and effectiveness of whistleblower systems within company groups. At the same time, the board of directors and management of the controlling company should be aware of the risks that may arise from group operations. They should establish a sound governance structure for subsidiaries, including reviewing the necessity of setting up subsidiaries, implementing varying governance structures depending on the type of subsidiary, and reassessing and inventorying important subsidiaries within the group to ensure their governance structures are appropriate, and their internal controls and whistleblower systems are effective, and to identify potential legal risks. |