| 英文摘要 |
This essay begins by revisiting the dissemination and reception of The Pale Horse in China, analyzing how it builds upon past understandings of Russian nihilism and nihilistic tendencies, while also connecting with early leftist intellectuals’revolutionary discourse. Subsequently, using Cao Ju-Ren’s analysis of The Pale Horse as a guide, it compares the different periods of“nihilistic”writings, unraveling a nuanced ideological context regarding revolution and nihilism that defies categorization by either the left or right. Within the leftist camp itself, interpretations of nihilism aren’t universally agreed upon. Qu Qiu-Bai and Mao Dun attempted to interpret the protagonist George through revolutionary or national historical lenses, while Zheng Zhen-Duo chose a psychoanalytic approach. Similarly, Cao Ju-Ren’s definition of nihilism evolved over time, from the initially critical“Crowism”to later, more ineffable philosophical musings, culminating in Jiu Dian, a novel heavily influenced by The Pale Horse, which exposes and depicts the twisted prosperity of 20th-century China’s political struggles and colonial Hong Kong. This reflects the intricate and multifaceted interplay between intellectuals and revolutionary history. |