| 英文摘要 |
Traditionally, Cantonese interrogatives are classified into four types: (1) yes-no questions, (2) A-not-A questions, (3) disjunctive questions, and (4) wh-questions (e.g., Gao 1980). However, recent studies propose a binary classification, dividing interrogatives into confirmation-seeking (CS) and information-seeking (IS) questions, a theory successfully applied to Mandarin, Xiang (Sinitic), English, and other languages (Her et al. 2022). This paper first points out that the traditional four-way classification lacks precision and overlooks universal patterns in interrogatives, advocating for a binary division for Cantonese. Specifically, we argue that yes-no questions stand alone as CS questions, while A-not-A belongs to the disjunctive type, which is, in turn, a subcategory of IS constituent questions together with wh-questions. Furthermore, the paper discusses several sentence-final particles, suggesting that呀aa4 and嚱he2 form CS polar questions, whereas話waa6 and先sin1 appear in IS questions. Additionally, we demonstrate that未mei6, found in the so-called VP-Neg question, should be analyzed as a kind of A-not-A question involving an implicit disjunction. |