| 英文摘要 |
For the past three centuries, the western world has been driven by a doctrine of progress, first articulated by philosophers of the European Enlightenment, according to which the destiny of humanity is to exercise dominion over the rest of creation. This doctrine has underwritten developments in science and technology which have improved the lives of millions. They have nevertheless come at the cost of mounting social injustice and environmental degradation. Today, these costs are no longer sustainable. Contemporary critics reject the belief in exceptional human destiny, calling instead for an alternative, post-humanist settlement that would nevertheless deprive humans of responsibility for the life around them, and leave coming human generations with no role to play in future planetary flourishing. This essay argues instead for a new humanism, premised on the claim that thanks to the gift of language, humans do indeed carry a burden of care not shared by other creatures. If nature is understood as a power to give birth to new life, then this is the burden of nurture, of creating the conditions for new-borne life to flourish. What, then, can new humanism say of the lives of generations to come? Many contemporary commentators envision a posthuman future ruled by digital technology. But new humanism, to the contrary, proposes a human future that is post-digital. This future lies not in incessant innovation but in the rejuvenation of old ways. Aligned to a doctrine of sustainability rather than progress, its commitment is to the renewal of life. |