| 英文摘要 |
In Taiwan, educational researchers usually use analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to analyze indicators’weights but this produces some controversial problems which impacts the quality and benefits for using AHP. The study discussed eight problems about using AHP in Taiwan, and also provided several options. There include over-simple introduc¬tions, lack of testing items’framework, using inadequate RI value, insuf¬ficient confirmation power of CR index, reasonable AIJ approach, brief report of analysis outcomes, sketchy analytic functions of AHP programs and software, as well as none significant differences between fuzzy AHP and classical AHP. Finally with macro views, three suggestions are pro¬posed that are building macro AHP ecological development chain, in¬novating the analytic procedure of AHP, and improving the functions of analytic programs for AHP. |