| 英文摘要 |
Most researches on contemporary art history in Taiwan today are influenced by the Western historiography tradition of art history which focuses on artists’biography, image analysis, or on various theoretical approaches of the New Art History. Nevertheless, in order to highlight the“contemporariness”of contemporary art in Taiwan, it is essential to further discover another historiography approach that could reveal the specific socio-political context entwined with this island’s art history. Therefore, this paper will start from bringing light to the historical conditions of contemporary art in Taiwan through the idea of“multiple temporalities”stemming from a critical reflection on the meaning of“contemporariness”. Following this reflection, it will be apparent that the phenomenon of“institutionalization”characterized in the development of contemporary art in Taiwan points out the importance of the category of“institution”in historiography research. Furthermore, by referring to Anne Cauquelin’s network theory and Taiwanese literature about contemporary art, this research will explore the conundrums of institutionalization that confront Taiwanese artists today. Finally, in the light of the dialectic discourse of Institutional Analysis, the challenge of institutionalization will open up possibilities for Taiwanese contemporary art practices to create the network of commoning while unfolding diverse local art histories. The main goal of this research thus consists in expanding the possibilities of historiography and epistemology of contemporary art in Taiwan. |