 |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。 【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】
|
| 篇名 |
從性侵害防治保護性社工職務角色──淺談執行性侵害非告訴乃論案件無意願進入司法程序之現況
|
| 並列篇名 |
The Role of Protective Social Workers in Preventing Sexual Assault and the Current Situation of Non-reporting Cases Unwilling to Enter Judicial Procedures: A Brief Discussion |
| 作者 |
劉怡芳 |
| 中文摘要 |
國內為保障性侵害被害人在尚未準備進入面對司法流程時能有一個緩衝機制,避免造成二度傷害,建置性侵害非告訴乃論案件「無意願」進入司法程序之處理流程。本文主要探討「從性侵害防治保護性社工職務角色,淺淡執行性侵害非告訴乃論案件無意願進入司法程序之現況」,以提出結論與建議,作為性侵害防治各領域工作者及中央主管機關參考,使性侵害案件整合性團隊能各司其職,讓被害人獲得最佳的司法保障。 故探討結果如下:一、現況:(一)性侵害案件屬刑事事件,社政主管機關行政先行之措施,取代刑事偵查角色及專業備配不足。(一)性侵害案件是刑事責任,無意願進入司法的案件研判,相對影響是否進入司法的結果,及未進入司法之涉嫌者在社會再犯之安全風險。 二、結論與建議:(一)司法制度面:性侵害案件之刑事事件中必需要行政與司法併行同時進行,以符合檢察機關及社政系統各司其職執行刑事偵查及被害人之保護措施;及對未進司法案件有必要建置監督管機制,確認後續司法程序,並且同時要加強被害人與涉嫌人兩造之社會預防性輔導作為。(二)社工角色面:正視保護性社會工作為司法社會工作範疇及專業養成,規範符合性侵害防治業務需所的職業養成;加強向未進司法流程被害人告知權益保障及社工對案件之專業訓練。 |
| 英文摘要 |
To safeguard the victims of sexual assault before they are ready to face the judicial process and to prevent secondary harm, a buffering mechanism has been established for cases of sexual assault where victims are unwilling to enter the judicial process. This paper primarily discusses the role of protective social workers in preventing sexual assault and the current situation of non-reporting cases unwilling to enter judicial procedures. It aims to provide conclusions and recommendations for professionals in various fields of sexual assault prevention and central authorities to ensure that interdisciplinary teams dealing with sexual assault cases can fulfill their duties effectively, thereby providing victims with the best judicial protection. The results of the exploration are as follows : I. Current Situation: A. Sexual assault cases are criminal incidents, but administrative measures by social welfare authorities often precede criminal investigations, replacing the roles of criminal investigators and addressing inadequate professional preparation. B. Determination of cases unwilling to enter the judicial process significantly affects whether they proceed judicially and the safety risks posed by suspects not entering the judicial system. II. Conclusions and Recommendations: A. Judicial System: - Criminal investigations in sexual assault cases should involve both administrative and judicial processes to ensure that prosecution and protection measures for victims are carried out effectively. - Establishing supervision mechanisms for cases not entering the judicial system to ensure follow-up judicial procedures. Strengthening preventive counseling for both victims and suspects in the community is also essential. B. Role of Social Workers: - Recognizing protective social work as part of judicial social work and emphasizing professional development to meet the needs of sexual assault prevention. - Providing non-reporting victims with information about their rights and ensuring social workers receive adequate training on handling such cases. |
| 起訖頁 |
63-93 |
| 關鍵詞 |
性侵害防治、保護性社工、非告訴乃論案件、無意願進入司法程序、Sexual Assault Prevention、Protective Social Work、Non-reporting Cases、Unwillingness to Enter Judicial Procedures |
| 刊名 |
亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊 |
| 期數 |
202107 (17期) |
| 出版單位 |
臺灣家庭暴力與性犯罪處遇協會;中正大學犯罪研究中心
|
| 該期刊-上一篇 |
性侵害加害人刑後強制治療處所設置地點爭議與解決之研究 |
| |