中國國際法自主知識體系的實踐邏輯

The Practical Logic of China's Autonomous Knowledge System

中國國際法學自主知識體系的構建不僅需要有理念上的自信與共識，更需要在實踐中自立自強、堅實推進。中國自主知識體系的構建需要立足中國的歷史文化與當代現實，國際法領域的自主知識體系，由於具有面對世界的特徵，更要敏銳發現中國問題、清晰界定中國問題、明確樹立中國觀念、深入探索中國實踐、扎實論證中國概念、系統總結中國理論。構建國際法自主知識體系的實踐標準包括六個方面：以真切的中國問題為研究對象，體現研究主體和客體的持續性，確保理論界與實踐界協同合作，積極開展學術團隊的坦誠交流，保證提出分析與論斷的透徹性，強化形成論斷與學說的體系性。從實踐方法上看，構建國際法自主知識體系應採取的方式包括實證法方法、歸因型方法、反思性方法、新建型方法四種，國際法自主知識體系的生成路徑則包括基於既有理論、基於數據資料、基於實踐經驗三種可能。通過持續、系統、透徹的理論耕耘，積極開放的理念傳播，最終促進自主知識體系的形成與完善。

The construction of China's autonomous knowledge system of international law requires not only conceptual consensus, but also solid promotion in practice. The construction of China's autonomous knowledge system is a proposition with clear timeliness and practicality. The core of an autonomous knowledge system is knowledge, "autonomous" and "system" are both concrete attributions of knowledge. The autonomous knowledge system requires continuous improvement of autonomy on the basis of public and professional knowledge, gradually reaching systematic standards. For Chinese international law, this requirement means further enhancing the ability to make independent judgments and think on the basis of existing information and knowledge, and further improving the systematic nature of international legal thinking and theory. The construction of an independent knowledge system needs to be based on China, reflect China's concerns, clarify China's position, and voice China's voice. Clearly define China's issues and provide clear explanations of the issues that China should address in its development process; clearly establish the concept of China and propose the basic principles that China should follow in its current economic, social, and cultural development; deeply explore China's practices and fully summarize China's experience in military, political, economic, cultural and other fields; solidly demonstrate the concept of China, and through in—depth argumentation and repeated refinement, summarize legal terms that highlight Chinese characteristics; systematically summarize Chinese theory, organically combine international law concepts and judgments with Chinese characteristics, forming the argumentative spectrum of Chinese international law. The practical standards for building an independent knowledge system of international law include six aspects: (1) Focus on the real Chinese context as the research object, focus on the core concerns faced by China's survival and development, and having a comprehensive understanding of China as its environment. (2) Reflect the continuity of research subjects and objects, advocate the construction of long—term teams from the perspective of academic researchers, and also advocate continuous tracking from the perspective of research content. (3) Ensure collaboration between the theoretical and practical communities, and establish a factual foundation for knowledge production. (4) Actively engage in honest communication with academic teams to promote openness in knowledge production and testing. (5) Ensure the thoroughness of analysis and argumentation, and promote the continuous upgrading of academic research quality. (6) Strengthen the systematic formation of judgments and theories, and promote the internal consistency and external organic correlation of academic theoretical research through logical, theoretical, and practical tests. From the perspective of practical methods, the technical paths that should be adopted to build an autonomous knowledge system of international law include empirical methods, attribution methods, reflective methods, and new methods. The generation path of an autonomous knowledge system of international law includes three possible paths: based on existing theories, based on data, and based on practical experience. Through continuous, systematic, and thorough theoretical cultivation, active and open dissemination of ideas, ultimately promoting the formation and improvement of an independent knowledge system.