| 英文摘要 |
The construction of urban verticality is full of risks, and the allocation and response to risks have their own institutional context, which forms risk governance. This article takes two sewer construction projects as examples, and illustrates that under the government procurement bidding regulations and the public construction regime, the Sewerage Systems Office of Taipei City Government gradually changed from a planning unit to a unit responsible for contracting, supervising, and recruiting non-governmental companies’resources to respond to the urgent need to upgrade urban infrastructure. Furthermore, in the face of underground uncertainties such as geological and hydrological conditions for sewer construction, builders must not only bear the costs under the framework of bidding regulations, but also rely on their elastic networking ability to mobilize resources or change the original design and construction method, so as to prevent engineering accidents and schedules lagging behind. Therefore, the recent changes in urban governance and infrastructure construction are far from being covered by theories on neo-liberalization. Additionally, the specific institutional context, materiality, and technology in response to risk must be considered. Elastic networking is not only the basis for builders to improve their professional capabilities in response to government bidding requirements and engineering problems, but also reflects the allocation of risk between builders and the government under a specific public construction regime, which is mediated by urban verticality and underground uncertainties of infrastructure projects. |