我國跟蹤騷擾案件跨網絡合作現況與改進作為之研究

跟蹤騷擾行為是一種複雜、持續的人際衝突問題，跟騷者的動機、成因、態樣，以及對被害人的影響各不相同，無論被害人人身安全維護或行為人再犯防制，除有賴公權力積極介入外，更需檢察、司法、社政、衛政、教育、勞政等機關之通力合作。除協助被害人外，也必須讓跟騷者接受懲罰或相關處遇，才能有效防制跟蹤騷擾行為的發生。我國跟蹤騷擾防制雖然是採取跨網絡合作模式，惟跟蹤騷擾防制法甫施行不久，運作方式仍在摸索中。為瞭解現行跟蹤騷擾案件跨網絡合作情形以及需要改善的方向，本研究在跟蹤騷擾防制法施行1年後，除透過文獻探討外，並經由深度訪談26位第一線的家防官、婦幼警察隊承辦人、檢察官及法官，以及舉辦兩場次焦點團體座談會，邀集13位實務工作者及學者專家參與等實證研究方式。本研究發現：（一）跟蹤騷擾案件處理幾乎沒有網絡合作；（二）目前最迫切的網絡資源是衛生主管機關積極介入；以及（三）網絡機關提供資源多寡影響司法系統保護措施。並據此提出：（一）警察機關負責跟騷案件的承辦人應具有家暴與性騷擾防治業務辦理經驗；（二）主管機關應系統性盤點網絡合作資源；（三）建置具體可行的網絡合作工作指引；（四）衛生機關應提供病因性加害人相關身心治療服務資源，及（五）建構以被害人為中心之刑事司法保護扶助體系等建議。

Stalking and harassment is a complex and diverse interpersonal conflict. The motivations, causes, and behaviors of stalkers, as well as their impact on the victim, are different. Therefore, regardless of the protection of the victim's personal safety and prevent recidivism, in addition to relying on the public power, like procuratorial, judicial, social affairs, health, education, labor administration and other agencies. Countries have gradually realized that they must bring together professionals from the criminal justice, mental health, and victim rights protection systems to coordinate to assist victims and to receive punishment or provide treatment for suspects. Although Stalking and Harassment Prevention Act also adopts a cross-network cooperation model in Taiwan, however, the mode of operation is still being explored. In order to understand the current situation of cross-network cooperation in stalking and harassment cases and the directions for improvement, this study used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to collect data. A total of 26 front-line domestic violence prevention officers, women's and children's protection division’s police, prosecutors and judges were interviewed in depth, and two focus group discussions were held. 13 practitioners, scholars and experts participated. After data analysis, this study found that: (1) There is almost no cooperation of cross-network in handling stalking and harassment cases for the present; (2) The most urgent network resource is that health authorities should actively intervene; (3) The amount of resources provided by network agencies affects the protection measures of the judicial system. Based on this, it is proposed that: (1) The person in charge of the stalking and harassment case in the police agency should have experience in the prevention and treatment of domestic violence and sexual harassment; (2) The competent authority should systematically take stock of network cooperation resources; (3) Develop cross-network guidelines for the cooperation; (4) Health agencies should provide physical and mental treatment services for offenders, and (5) Establishing a victim-centered criminal judicial protection and support system.