| 英文摘要 |
In the field of international investment arbitration, International Investment Treaties or Agreements have always been criticized for their lack of protection in human rights, the environment, public health and other basic values. Meanwhile the issue with Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism (ISDS) being its over-protective nature towards investor interests, which also deprived the discretion of the host state on forming public policies. In addition, the ISDS is also criticized to be untransparent, opaque and unfair. The above situation has deepened the distrust on the current international investment arbitration mechanism among international community, also hindering the SDGs values. This has sparked the effort by international community towards promoting the reform of the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism. This article attempts to explore ISDS reform with the view of the multifaceted aspects of SDGs by first analyzing the UNCITRAL Draft Provisions on Procedural and Cross-cutting Issue (hereinafter Draft Provisions) in order to discuss what major changes are to be made to the ISDS. Secondly, this article takes a look at the intentions of participating countries of UNCITRAL Working Group III regarding the reform. Thirdly, this article assesses the impact of the Draft Provisions on existing investment agreements. And finally, this article discusses how the Draft Provisions will help meet the SDGs. |