| 英文摘要 |
The dispute settlement system is widely considered to be the“jewel in the crown"of the World Trade Organization. Along with the decision-making inefficiency of the political organs, which are supposed to check and balance the quasi-judicial power, the efforts made by the Appellate Body to interpret deliberately ambiguous treaty provisions have often been criticized as judicial activism. The United States, who criticized the Appellate Body most, sought to re-balance the quasi-judicial power by blocking the (re)appointment of the Appellate Body Members. As a result, the Appellate Body ceased to operate after December 2019 for lack of members. Facing such unprecedented WTO crisis, academic and practitioners suggested various solutions. Members also restated and clarified the WTO provisions specific to the six categories of concerns raised by the United States. However, these reform efforts were far below level expected by the U.S., and therefore the impasse continued. For the moment, how to secure the panel report and prevent it from being the collateral damage of the loss of the Appellate Body caught most attention of Members. There were two approaches being suggested, one was plurilateral non-appeal agreement, and the other was (multilateral) interim-appeal arbitration. Both needs Members’consent and the latter even requires the WTO Secretariat’s assistance for operation. Whether they will be able to preserve the function of panel reports from being collateral damages of the Appellate Body remains to be seen. It is for sure that before the 12th Ministerial Conference, due to the Presidential Election of the United States, there is no way to see any breakthrough in the negotiation on the reform of the Appellate Body. The jewel of the crown still looks dim in the near future. |