嘉義市議員建議款分配的政治分析   全文下載

The Distribution of Earmark Grants: An Empirical Analysis in Chiayi City

Earmark Grant, one of prerogatives which are reserved for the councillors, can be found in many cities and counties across Taiwan. It has been an open secret for city/county councillors forging tacit agreements with the city/county governments in earmarking funds to be spent on specific projects.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and non-partisan candidates had won Chaiyi City mayoral elections for twenty years. Power structures changed, however, when a divided government ensued following a Kuomintang (Chinese Nationalist Party, KMT) win in the mayoral election in 2006.Tension arose between the city government and the city council. With this in mind, it merits looking into whether a subtle sign can be found and the way of appropriation spending is challenged in the 7th Chaiyi City councillorship (from March 1, 2006 to Feb. 28, 2010).
The author follows theories of distributive politics to determine answers to the above-mentioned questions by focusing on the relationship between political influence and councillors’earmark grants and the political influence
on election results. The results show that the amount of money councillors obtained through earmark grants was affected by the following factors: constituency needs, a seat on the procedure committee, partisanship, affiliations with a political faction, etc. Moreover, electoral competitiveness in the district and average voter turnout of the benefited borough have contributed to the councillors’willingness to strive for earmark grants. Councillors who won
the election by a narrow margin would be more eager to fight for earmark grants for the next election. Councillors will be more inclined to direct money to particular purposes for the district with higher voter turnout. In addition, councillor’s efforts in earmarking increase significantly in the year of election.
Last but not least, the relationship was found to be weak between the cases and amount of money from earmark grants and the number of vote received between terms. However, there was a significant difference between the change of number of votes received between terms and four independent variables, namely, seniority, partisanship, serving on the procedure committee and affiliations with a political faction.