| 英文摘要 |
Object: The purpose of this research was to validate the Chinese version Group Climate Questionnaire.
Method: We tested the internal reliability and construct validity by analyzing the data from dynamic interpersonal group psychotherapy in the outpatient clinic.
Result: The internal consistency Cronbach alpha coefficients of engagement, conflict and avoidance were 0.89, 0.83 and 0.20. The Guttman Split-Half Coefficients of split-half reliability were 0.81, 0.83 and 0.06 for engagement, conflict and avoidance, respectively. By factor analysis, we found 3 components including engagement, conflict and avoidance. Items of engagement and conflict were compatible with the original English version but items of avoidance were not.
Conclusion: The subscales of Chinese version Group Climate Questionnaire including engagement and conflict have good reliability and validity. It is appropriate to apply these 2 subscales in the evaluation of groups. The avoidant subscale needs some adjustment for further clinical application. |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
