「校園暴力的反擊正義？」：YouTube特定留言區的爭勝抗爭

“Is Reactive Aggression in School Violence Justice?”–Agonistic Struggles in Specific YouTube Comment Sections

本文從爭勝觀點並採用混合方法，檢視台灣TVBS有關「美工刀反擊」的新聞影片在YouTube留言區的爭勝抗爭，結果有三項發現。首先，新聞報導的確能激發網友對事件的關注和討論，但留言已超出新聞的框架，除了跳脫主流價值和官方觀點外，也關切新聞未觸及的問題面向，呈現出多種語言風格和各種意見。其次，留言區內存在多元的公眾，以留言作為文化實踐，參與爭奪「反擊」的定義權，至少有三種不同的公眾和論述被形成，分別是理性公眾的反對反擊論述、憐憫公眾的適當反擊論述，以及義憤公眾的以暴制暴論述，其中尤以後者居多。最後，留言以各自表述為主，但仍有網友嘗試和不同立場者交換意見，形成更鮮明的爭勝抗爭。不過，留言區內也出現「仇恨」言論，可能超出「爭勝」範疇，意圖將異己轉變成仇敵，恐不利於民主社會的發展。

Using the agonistic approach, this study examines the agonistic struggles within the YouTube comment section of Taiwan's TVBS news videos on 'Fight back with the Box Knife' through mixed methods. The study reveals three significant findings. Firstly, news videos have the ability to arouse netizens' attention and discussions on events. However, these comments went beyond the scope of the news, not only deviating from mainstream values and official views but also presenting various language styles and multiple viewpoints on aspects not covered by the news. Second, the public in the comment section is diverse, participating in cultural practices and engaging in debates over the definition of ''reactive aggression'' through their comments. At least three different types of publics and discourses have emerged: rational publics opposing reactive aggression, sympathetic publics advocating for appropriate reactive aggression, and angry publics endorsing a tit-for-tat response, with the latter being the most prevalent. Lastly, the comments are mainly personal expressions, but there are still netizens attempting to exchange views with those holding different positions, leading to more distinct agonistic struggles. Lastly, the comments are mainly personal expressions, but there are still netizens attempting to exchange views with those holding different positions, resulting in more distinct agonistic struggles. However, there are also 'hate' speeches in the comment area, which may go beyond the scope of 'agonistic struggle,' aiming to turn dissidents into enemies, which is not conducive to the development of a democratic society.