英文摘要 |
In the 44th Year of Wanli reign (1616), Yuan Zhongdao accepted the invitation of Hao Gongyan to comment on Cao Chen's She Hua Lu, proposing his own perception of the author and the personal interpretation of the text, as well as adding extra value of the publication of Cao Chen's She Hua Lu.
This article, taking She Hua Lu written by Cao Chen (1583-1647) as the research topic , explores the aesthetic communication between Yuan Zhongdao and Cao Chen's She Hua Lu and the identities and differences of the aesthetic norms of so many commentators on Shishuo styles in the past as well.
Basing on the dual structure of the Jurgen Habermas's discourse, the approach discussed in this research is conducted in two ways: One is the declarative discourse, expressing and conveying the information and contents of Yuan Zhongdao's discourse on Marginalia on the aspect of semantic analysis to present the true nature of the text and the discourse, and as well as the expression of the speaker's intention to convey the sincerity of the subject matter itself. The other is the discourse of words conducted with deeds in nature, which is the transformation in this aspect from the syntactic nature of the discourse to the comprehensible nature of others.
This study finds that Yuan Zhongdao's discourse, taking ''Miao'' as the crux of the issue, achieves the goal of the realization of the discourse communication, reaches the common consensus and leads to the identification orientation to make supplements and revisions on the aesthetic norms of Cao Chen's She Hua Lu, and to manifest '' Miao Zai Han Xu '' as the universal standards of the aesthetic norms and consensus of the Shishuo styles from then on. |