英文摘要 |
This study aimed to investigate differences in musculoskeletal injury among different branches of foot reflexology in Taiwan. In this study, 59 foot reflexology were surveyed by observation method and face-to-face interview questionnaire. The survey sites are the northern, central, southern, and eastern regions of Taiwan. 60 questionnaires were distributed, and 59 questionnaires were returned, with a recovery rate of 98.3%. Reflexologists is a physical exertion critical task where work-related musculoskeletal disorders and injuries are associated with interacting ergonomic design factors over time. The observation method records and analyzes the podiatrist's ''posture'', ''strength'', ''joint curvature'', ''use of auxiliary tools'', ''environment and related equipment'' and other items by taking pictures. The questionnaire adopts the intentional sampling method. This study utilized four questionnaires: 1) basic information, 2) living conditions, 3) working conditions, 4) musculoskeletal pain scale scale. The musculoskeletal pain scale is a modified Nordic musculoskeletal pain scale. This study adopted a 0–5 point scale, with 0 indicating no pain, Finally, five indicates extreme pain, and the body cannot move independently. To investigate the working conditions and musculoskeletal pain of Taiwan reflexologists. Subsequently, data were counted using SPSS V22. The results show that: (1) There are different branches of foot reflexology, and the training time of foot reflex therapists is different; (2) The biggest difference between foot reflexology in Taiwan lies in take human factors engineering measures, including the posture of the manipulation, the difference of and the use of auxiliary tools, which will affect the degree of musculoskeletal injuries; (3) FJM foot reflex therapists have lower musculoskeletal injuries than NFJM foot reflex therapists; (4) Most foot reflex therapists require ergonomically designed equipment and tools. |