英文摘要 |
The demand for gender equality has become a universal value. Looking at the interpretations and judgments of our country’s justices on gender equality, although there are still shortcomings in the reasoning process, intervention in the legislative formation space and direct legislative discretion are declared unconstitutional. , as well as the justice’s consensus in voting, it shows the justice’s determination to defend gender equality. For the discussion of gender equality, in addition to starting from the legal basis, we will further discuss the protection and connotation of gender equality in the Constitution. This article believes that more can be gained through the experience of comparative law. Due to the length, we will focus on the United States for the time being. We will use the practical cases of the Federal Supreme Court to discuss the development of American law, hoping to get some inspiration from them. In terms of practice, the relevant interpretations made by our country's justices have confirmed that the current legal provisions do contain gender discrimination. In addition to eliminating these discriminations, a law should be established that is more consistent with the spirit and principles of gender equality. From the Supreme Court Interpretation No. 365 to the Constitutional Judgment No. 1 in 112, not only did the relevant legal provisions be revised repeatedly, which not only improved the gender status in society, but also began to realize gender in other fields. The necessity and urgency of equality make gender equality no longer just a slogan, but truly implemented in our country's legal system. Gender equality is not a simple and easy issue. After all, differences do exist. However, the true meaning of equality does not lie in what the differences are, but in how to treat these differences. |