英文摘要 |
In this study, 59 students from the Hsing Wu University who took ''Media Writing'' as an elective were provided with two news stories to compare the quality of news writing. After reading the news, students were asked to fill out a Google form for the indicators ''fair and objective'', ''true and reliable'', ''useful to the public'', and ''readability''. The sequence of news presentation was balanced by a copy of the questionnaire. From the 59 questionnaires collected, it was found that when comparing news written by real journalists with news written by AI, real journalists did have a slight edge in these four indicators, but not an overwhelming one. Based on the students' responses, if we add up the respondents who thought that the two stories performed equally well or that the AI wrote better news, only the indicator of ''truthfulness and reliability'' was recognized more by the real journalists, while the other three indicators were such that the news written by the AI could replace the real journalists' writing. This result may be related to the characteristics of the participating students. None of the 59 students in this study use newspapers as their main source of news, and some of them do not even read the news. This group characteristic should represent the reading habits of most young people in Taiwan, and may indicate that their requirement for news writing is only the acquisition of basic information. The results of the analysis can be used as a reference for teaching media writing and can also be an inspiration for the future development of the media industry. |