英文摘要 |
The study aims to explore how young breast cancer survivors perceive psychological growth since operation treatment, focusing on their transformative experiences of interpersonal situatedness and sense of future temporality. There has been much discussion about perceived positive changes from negative stress events, such as“posttraumatic growth”(PTG), a concept describing positive psychological change experienced as a result of struggling with highly challenging, highly stressful life circumstances. These circumstances represent significant challenges to the adaptive resources of the individual, and pose significant challenges to the individual’s understanding of the world and their place in it. PTG involves“life-changing”psychological shifts in thinking and relating to the world and the self that contribute to a personal process of change which is deeply meaningful. It is also known as“benefit-finding”or“adversarial growth”. Although the experience of positive changes and PTG in breast cancer has been shown in some studies, it has not been adequately studied in young breast cancer patients. How do young breast cancer patients experience positive change from the sufferings and pains of disease? How do those survivors who experience positive changes view and reflect on these illness processes? These issues are further explored in this article. The participants in this study were recruited from a sampling of subjects from Wang’s dissertation (2014). Four participants with a mean age 35.75 were interviewed and their data were transcribed and then analyzed via a phenomenological psychology approach. The data analysis procedures of carrying out phenomenological psychology were based on six steps: data collection, empathic immersion, meaning units, constituent themes, situated structure, and general structure. Three themes of breast cancer survivors’experiences emerged from the data analysis: (1) temporality: solicitude modes of being-in-the-world, (2) situatedness: post-traumatic growth as a multiple phenomenon, and (3) trajectory: heterogeneity. This research shows how cancer treatment can be conceptualized as an overflow of normal suffering experience and carrying out the ethical action of care. Two participants faced their limited lifetime by taking on an authentic mode of being-toward-death by letting-go of control, which illustrates their“being-in-itself”and living with existential uncertainty. The other two participants held onto control in their limited lifetime and engaged with a future temporality of hope to cope with their predicament, which illustrates“being-for-itself”and projects the possibilities of avoiding the constraints of others in the future. Regardless of patients’“being-in-itself”or“being-for-itself”, the results show how the suffering of illness constitutes a form of Dasein and being-in-the-world of the relation self (family self;ka-kī), as well as a movement from the self to significant familiar others through ethical action. Dasein, then, is what constitutes being-towards-death at this moment. The suffering crispation experienced by patients reflected the existential depth of meaning. In Heidegger’s words,“The totality of being of Dasein as care means: ahead-of-itself-already-being-in (a world) as being-together-with beings encountered in the world.” This study shows that the meaning of anxiety is not the monotony of psychopathology, but rather the ontological meaning of ethical caring. The classification of scale indicators is a scientific structure that weakens affective experiences. The disease is a positive and innovative experience for participants’living reality rather than just a fact of disease cells growing or decreasing. This observation shows that the suffering of illness can spur growth dynamics growth toward the disclosive affectivity of Sorge (care) in one’s being-in-the-world, which consists of encountering the self and others, or cultivating a relational self between me and family that is related to the cultural characteristics of a“we-ness”trajectory through life and death. Ethical caring is the cornerstone of a relational understanding of human subjectivity and is radically different from medical positivism. The implications of this study’s outcomes and future research agendas are discussed in the final section. |