英文摘要 |
The development of FinTech helping corporations to improve their internal compliance regulation measures, in order to achieve the goal of Corporate Governance, which is known as “RegTech”. It also uses Blockchain’s characteristics of decentralization to emerge a unique business autonomous organization, “DAO” (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) in recent years. DAO takes the principle of “Unity of Ownership and Control” as the operation mode, entrusts organizational decision-making authority to each investor, and is characterized by removing the generation of agency costs and sharing operation authority to attract investors. However, in the actual operation of DAO, is its token holder really in the situation of all operations with common interests and symmetrical information? Or is it just under the banner of decentralization, but in fact it is still a centralized organizational operation mode with separation of ownership and operation? In addition, is DAO a new type of commercial organizatio n, whose advantages can replace the Company Limited by Shares? Furthermore, with the encouragement of the development of blockchain technology and DAO organizations, how should the law regulate this DAO organization? These issues need to be discussed in depth. Therefore, starting from the evolution of business organizations, this article analyzes whether DAO conforms to the form of business organizations under the current law, and whether its operation connotation can truly achieve the effectiveness of information symmetry and common interests, and have a consensus decision. And then take American law as the research object of comparative law, and introduce how the American law define and regulate DAO organization. Finally, the article makes a response to the problem awareness, and hopes that the research of this paper can serve as the direction for legislation and financial authorities to think about DAO organization and blockchain related technology laws or regulatory measures in the future.
|