英文摘要 |
It has increasingly become a consensus in the current Chinese criminal law academic community that Chinese criminal law research should strengthen its subjectivity. To strengthen the subjectivity of Chinese criminal law research, we should take Chinese criminal law provisions as the logical starting point, closely combine with Chinese judicial practice, and give full play to the role of precedents in improving the level of Chinese criminal law research. In the study of comparative law, it is necessary to take knowing others and knowing ourselves as the purpose, and when introducing extraterritorial criminal law knowledge, we should not only pay attention to dynamically grasping the development and change of extraterritorial criminal law theory, but also correctly judge the stage of China’s social development; at the same time, it is necessary to prevent garbling and consciously integrate extraterritorial criminal law knowledge into the discourse system of Chinese criminal law research. In terms of methodology, Chinese criminal law research should be inclusive, attach importance to the diversity of research methods and the openness of research perspectives, and shift from the over emphasis on school debates to compromise and unity. In addition, Chinese criminal law scholars urgently need to make up for their shortcomings and do a lot of fundamental and extremely difficult work in exploring and fully utilizing the traditional resources in Chinese history and achieving their modern transformation. The strengthening of subjectivity consciousness will undoubtedly activate the creativity and imagination of Chinese criminal law scholars, and in a good atmosphere of gentlemen seek harmony but not uniformity, better promote the realization of justice in Chinese criminal law and display the international image and due character of Chinese criminal law. |