英文摘要 |
This paper elaborates on the thought of the seven day embryo formation theory found in the Chinese version of Buddhist books. This theory holds that seven days constitute a cycle and that 38 such cycles is the period needed to form a fetus. The thought is set in the background of Indian classical medicine and is confined to Buddhism. It differs greatly from ''Gso-ba Rig-pa'' (醫方明) which believes that a month constitutes a cycle'' and that nine months is the period needed to form a fetus. After referring to the classics of Agama, I discovered that the theory of embryo formation found in ''Gso-ba Rig-pa'' is generally similar to that of Agama, from which we may deduce that the seven day embryo formation theory is derived from Mahayana Buddhism and is not found in original Buddhism. It was generally believed that the theory mentioned above exerted no influence on Chinese medicine. In this paper, I list a variety of books on Taoism, medicine, popular literature, and miscellaneous writers to prove that the theory on seven day embryo formation, originating from the Chinese version of Buddhist books, is mentioned and has come to be recognized. After its entry into the Chinese domain of thought, some noteworthy aspects of the theory on seven day embryo formation displayed in terms of thought is as follows: the ''las-kyi rlung'' (業風) through which the embryo demonstrates its dynamism is neglected, and the process of 38 seven days of embryo formation has developed into a mechanical listing of separate seven day embryo formations. This theory thus resembles established Chinese theories on pregnancy such as Xu Zhicai's Prescriptions on Pregnancy. It is believed that at the beginning of embryonic development, the embryo does not have subjectivity, (reincarnation) and therefore pregnancy becomes a process of aimless growth and development without subjectivity. This theory has been influenced by established Chinese theories on pregnancy. This paper falls into the category of research and discussion on ideological History and Philology. It employs a large amount of data and numerous methods of comparison, including comparisons between Chinese and Tibetan literature, China and India, and ''Gso-ba Rig-pa'' and Buddhist medicine, all of which may contribute to research on this subject. |