英文摘要 |
Kung Shih K'u, Kung Shih Ch'ien and Kung Yung Ch'ien were vastly different m their functions. However, their differences were not clearly indicated in official histories and scholars of the ancient and modern times were often misled. Recently, two Japanese scholars, Professor Tomi Saeki and Professor Shizuo Sogabe, presented special articles to expound them, yet still failed to clarify their characteristics and errors in the professors' interpretations were frequent. In view of this, the author tries to elucidate their characteristics in accordance with Sung Hui Yao Chi Kao (宋會要輯稿) , Hsü Tzu Chih T'ung Chien Ch'ang Pien (資治通鑑長編) and other writings of the people of the Sung Dynasty. |