英文摘要 |
It has frequently been said that literary Tibetan is an ergative language. That is, it has just one case form, the absolutive, for the object of a transitive verb and the subject of an intransitive verb; another case form, the ergative, is used for the subject of a transitive verb. This differentiates Tibetan from those languages which have one case form, the nominative, for the subject of either a transitive or an intransitive verb and another, the accusative, for the object of a transitive verb. We propose to consider here to what extent ergativity prevails in modern, colloquial Tibetan, which differs markedly from the literary language. |