我國知識産權效力爭議仲裁的理論基礎與實現路徑

The Theoretical Basis and Realization Path of China’s Intellectual Property Arbitration of Disputes over the Validity of Intellectual Property Rights

仲裁在解决知識産權糾紛中具有相對優勢。但是，知識産權效力爭議仲裁在我國尚未得到明確認可，這制約了我國知識産權仲裁的理論展開與制度構建。知識産權的私權屬性爲知識産權效力爭議仲裁提供了重要的理論依據和規範起點。知識産權獲取的國家授予性，以及知識産權糾紛處理的公共政策考量，均幷不足以否定知識産權效力爭議的可仲裁本質。其他法域知識産權仲裁的發展經驗，爲我國推行知識産權效力爭議仲裁提供了有益的借鑒。爲此，我國應當積極探索開展知識産權效力爭議仲裁的理論路徑與機制構建，從仲裁實踐、司法、行政、立法等多個維度協同推進知識産權效力爭議仲裁，適時推動建立符合我國國情、具有中國特色的知識産權仲裁制度體系。

Arbitration has advantages in resolving intellectual property disputes. However, China has not explicitly recognized the arbitrability of disputes over the validity of intellectual property rights, which restricts the theoretical studies and system constructions of China’s intellectual property arbitration. The private nature of intellectual property rights provides a critical theoretical and legislative basis for arbitrating disputes over the validity of intellectual property rights. The acquisition of intellectual property rights may consider it is granted by the state, as well as the public policy considerations regarding resolving intellectual property disputes, shall not negate intellectual property rights’ arbitrable nature. Other jurisdictions’ development experience of intellectual property arbitration provides instructive references for the implementation of arbitration over intellectual property rights’ validity disputes in China. Therefore, China shall actively explore the theoretical basis and system construction regarding arbitration over intellectual property rights’ validity disputes, and promote arbitration from multiple perspectives such as arbitration practice, judiciary, administration, and legislation, thus timely promoting the establishment of an intellectual property rights arbitration system suitable for China’ s conditions and with Chinese characteristics.