| 英文摘要 |
Space is important for human beings; it is not only the background of human existence but the existence itself. Lefebvre’s argument in The Production of Space is that space is always secularized, structuralized and organized by social relationships; it is filled with artificial traces rather than an empty concept. Further, Foucault expands spatial theory to the discussion of interpersonal relationship. He thinks individuals and space are mutual influenced. Individual is shaped in certain space. In patriarchal systems, female are constrained by male space which includes family space and public space. Because having attached to male space for a long time, women lose their independency. Attaching to the male-dominant world, women cannot find their own space so that their spatial anxiety emerges. Russian society’s traditional patriarchal system imprisoned women in attic; women had no right to participate in male affairs. Women were secluded in houses and shouldered all chores, such as childcare and housework. Although Russia is broad, Russian women were the “others” in Russian empire. Russian men could enjoy the broad geographical space and the imperial power space, but Russian women received no benefit from these advantages. In Russian era, women were secluded in home; in Soviet age, women were secluded in town. They were defeated by housework, poverty, and failure in making living. In the end of 19th century, Russian society had transformed. Woman issues had emerged and caught the attention of a lot of intellectuals. Chekhov was one of these intellectuals. He concerned Russian women’s inner space, self-awareness and social identification. He also put the discussion of woman issue into his works. This paper aims at discussing the relationship between space and individual in Chekhov’s novels with spatial theory and probing Russian woman issues in the end of 19th century from the perspectives of room, house, inner space, stranded space and desire for cities. |