英文摘要 |
An interpretation that rising liability-asset ratio (L/A ratio) of Mainland China’s stated-owned industrial enterprises aggravates their reforms and liberalization is misguided. The increased L/A ratio in 1980 on end was due to the transformation from planned economy to market-oriented economy. In the mid-1990s, however, the L/A ratio stabilized gradually. In addition, officers of top rank who worried that high L/A ratio might bring negative influence on China’s economy should realize that the high L/A ratio could breed high Return on Equity (ROE) provided that other factors can be under control. This article primarily probes the correlativity between L/A ratio and ROE, utilizing four indicators- ROE, industrial profit per value-added, (profit + tax)/(fixed quote working capital + net fixed assets), and return on assets (ROA) under statistic regression analysis. The finding is that once the endogenicity of L/A ratio is discarded, the positive correlation incurs between market share of industrial add value and profitability, whereas, negative correlation takes place between investment turnover and profitability so dose L/A ratio to profitability. However, one the endogenicity of L/A ratio is concerned, the positive effect can be found. Between L/A ratio and profitability, which implies that the financial leverage can play an critical role in Mainland China. To sum up, high L/A ratio might not be bad; it depends on how financial management is arranged. |