以給付扶養費裁判考量因素論社會福利資格的評估落實

自2010年增訂民法第1118條之1後，開啟了親屬之間可免除或減輕扶養義務的可能性，然而其中何謂未盡扶養義務而「情節重大」事由，係由法院個別判斷，而未有一致之標準。因此，本文透過內容分析法，檢閱2019年至2021年間共327份案由為「給付扶養費」之裁定書，並透過卡方與邏輯迴歸等統計方法，試圖歸納法院進行「給付扶養費」裁定時的考量因素，發現「入監」、「離婚」、「未共同生活」，皆為與裁定結果相關的顯著項目。於此同時，因社會福利資格而衍生的扶養義務爭議，亦為近年備受關注的議題，因此，也試圖針對二者之間的關聯進行討論，並提出相關建議。

Since the Civil Code article 1118-1 was revised in 2010, citizens will have the option to waive or minimize the requirement to provide support for their family members. However, there is no standardized definition of what constitutes an instance being ''inequitable for a person to pay the maintenance.'' Using the content analysis method and a review of 327 cases from 2019 to 2021, this study intends to summarize the court's ruling on exempting the duty to pay maintenance. It was discovered using Chi-square and logistic regression that living apart, divorce, and incarceration were all significant factors. In the meanwhile, disagreements over social welfare systems and the requirement to pay maintenance have come to light recently. Additionally, this essay tried to explain its connections and offer suggestions.