英文摘要 |
Volunteers participated in a roadkill survey with the liberty of choosing different modes of transportation, including by foot, bike, scooter, or car, depending on the local line-transect status. This method helps increase participation rate and obtain a larger sample size, although the roadkill survey detection rate would be affected by the chosen mode of transportation. In this study, we tested the transportation influence on road carcass detection probability, and evaluated factors of roadkill survey detection probability, including the survey speed of observers, experience of observers, road types, species taxon, and area size of roadkill body. Surveys by foot showed the highest effectiveness (74%), bicycle (42%), scooter (32%) was second highest, and car (12%) resulted in the lowest detection rate. The modeling results show that transportation mode and observer moving speed were the primary factors influencing the carcass survey detection rate, and the experience of observers and road types were the minor factors. We also discovered that the area size of roadkill body and observer moving speed can significantly affect carcass detection probability. Slow-walking observers could search for the most species and roadkill bodies. Considering the trade-off between feasibility and participation of citizen science projects, we suggest volunteers/observers search carcasses by scooter, keeping the moving speed below 6km/hr, and allowing more than 30 minutes of search time on the 3km line-transect. The research team needs to train experienced volunteers and maintain the fixed study site with the same observers to improve detection probability. This study result will be useful to correct sampling bias and estimate the abundance of animals killed on the roads in Taiwan. We could also assess the roadkill risk of different taxonomic animals. |