英文摘要 |
The United States has long used the term “international waters” to refer to the waters outside territorial waters. While this term is not a as contained in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, it has never caused significant controversy. However, in June of 2022, China rarely criticized the United States for using the term “international waters” to refer to the Taiwan Strait and emphasized that “the waters of the Taiwan Strait extend from both sides of the Taiwan Strait to the centerline of the Strait, and are in turn China’s internal waters, territorial waters, contiguous zone, and exclusive economic zone.” To this end, in light of contemporary law of the sea norms and primarily the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, this article examines the legal status of the Taiwan Strait and the applicable regime, and the legality of the term “international waters”, as well as the legal and political implications behind China’s claim. In conclusion, the Taiwan Strait is not subject to the transit passage regime. As to territorial waters within the Taiwan Strait, foreign warships enjoy the right of innocent passage. As to non-territorial waters within the Taiwan Strait, they enjoy freedom of navigation in exclusive economic zones. Lastly, this article suggests the Taiwan government should publicize the nationality, type, and number of warships of foreign countries passing through the Taiwan Strait with an aim to maintaining Taiwan Strait’s internationality. Otherwise, all waters in the Taiwan Strait might subject to China’s exclusive jurisdiction. |