同時不共代的道路時間景觀

Uncoevalness of the Roads' Timescapes

隘寮群魯凱族人在沒有「霧臺鄉主動脈」臺 24 線之前，是透過傳統以來的幾條通道彼此連結，或向外移動、行旅。這些傳統道路不僅維繫境內魯凱族人密切往來，藉此移動設施，也能夠與遷移外地的族人保持頻繁的互動。呈現網狀連結的隘寮群魯凱傳統交通路徑，不同於臺 24 線「大動脈」在座標、方向偏移及其向外鋪展的動線及延伸，而是著眼在族群內部的聯繫、生計實施以及物質資源的獲取。就此意義，當代被指稱作微血管的部落周遭往耕作區、往採集區、往獵場的路等，過往其重要性遠遠大過於現今覆蓋其上、通往漢人平原區域的臺 24 線。哪一條路是主要道路？更有它的重要性？透過時間、變遷的視角，將更能掌握它的意義與層次。千絲萬縷、棲居不同地層的（傳統）道路路徑，承載在地族人的腳步行動、記憶與故事，並註記了個人和集體生命的重要節點。本文對這些場域的探查將透過隘寮群魯凱生活領域當中層級不一的幾條道路，著眼各別道路的修整工作，呈現彼此不甚相似的時間性，以及顯現的時間景觀。如果稍微往物的視角偏移、梳理道路的時間性和時間景觀，從中將能夠相當去掌握它是如何透過物質性之各項作因而形成。而若從人的視角、活動、事件和組織作為進行追索，則程度上能夠體察在物質影響之下而開展出來的社會及文化作為，即時間之社會性進路的探討。道路物質時間與社會時間兩者是否協作、（不）同步或斷裂，呈顯的同時不共代，揭示在地族人通過道路而來的主體能動性以及時間主權的具身、具地體現。

The Ailiao Rukai relied primarily on traditional roads to connect, to migrate, and to travel before Taiwan Provincial Highway 24, known as the aorta of Wutai Township, was constructed. In the old days, their traditional roads facilitated close relationships among the Rukai people in the region and allowed departed or relocated kinsmen to maintain close connections with home. An intricate network, the traditional roads served the purposes of internal connection, livelihood support, and resource acquisition. By contrast, Taiwan Provincial Highway 24 was built based on the logic of geographic coordination and direction, traffic flows, and potential extensions. This means that these pathways to the farmland around the community, to the resource collecting areas, and hunting ground, the capillaries, were far more important than Provincial Highway 24, which overlays them and leads to the plains, settled by the Han from China. Which road is the main passageway? Which road is more important? A study from the temporal perspective that reflects changes will help shed light on their significance. The intertwining traditional roads at different geographical strata recorded the footsteps, memories, and stories of the local Rukai people. They were the important nodes in the axis of life for individuals as well as the community. This article explores roads laid out at different layers and imbedded in the lives of the Ailiao Rukai people, focusing on the maintenance of each road to accentuate different temporality and timescapes. In this context, studying the “objects” helps to elucidate on the formulation of roads through the interaction of various factors of materiality. Investigation from human perspectives, activities, events, and organizations provides clues to understanding the social and cultural actions under the influence of materials as well as the social significance of time. The material time and social time of roads, and their coordination and synchronization/ asynchronization and disruption highlight the (un)coevalness and the embodiment and emplacement of agency and ownership of time of local people through roads.