英文摘要 |
On the basis of knowledge, communication, and respect between medical personnel and patients, if the process of sharing medical information is not ideal, such sharing of information often leads to poor guidance and the inability of patients to make effective decisions. Through the operational modes of the quality control circle and a structured written interview questionnaire, we find that there is a high degree of difficulty (reaching up to 5.66 points) when decision-making is derived from spoken guidance. This study uses a cause-andeffect analysis chart to display the three main reasons as to why spoken guidance by medical personnel sharing medical information leads to less-than-ideal decision-making results: (1) the strict use of spoken guidance renders the patient incapable of calmly weighing decision factors, (2) the strict use of spoken guidance leads to too abstract of a decision-making process for the patient to understand their medical condition and (3) the medical information the patient gains knowledge of and the information that the patient then relays to their family members differs. This study’s solutions developed through the project team include the establishment of a structured written interview questionnaire, the arrangement of instructor courses based on the results of the questionnaire, assistance in the production of medical sharing aids, and enhanced team-to-team communication. After implementation of the improvement strategies, decision-assisted tools are then used to strengthen the guidance effect of the decision-maker, and the facilitation of the educational curriculum and community promotion activities reduces the difficulty of sharing decision-making guidance to a target value of 3.66, promoting two-way communication between medical personnel and patients. |