英文摘要 |
It is a significant solution to solve the issues of lacking of relevant specific interpretations and case-law about the prohibition provisions on data localization in the legal frameworks of WTO by setting up the aforesaid prohibition provisions in the regional free trade agreements. The RCEP, of which Articles 14.2 and 15.2 in Chapter 12 stipulate the prohibition provisions of data localization, is in fact on the basic framework of the CPTPP. Meanwhile, some other provisions in Chapter 12 indirectly contain the prohibition of data localization, and some indirectly set up the exception of data localization. In fact, the provisions on legitimate public policy, horizontal provisions and essential security interest provision are the main exceptions of data localization. So far, not any trade agreement clearly defines their mean and scope, but the WTO case-law claims that it is impractical to define their concrete meaning on 'one size fits all'; they should instead be factually assessed from the aspects of the Parties' existing realities and its legal system. The anti-circumvention provisions, which include the anti-discrimination and anti-disguised restriction provisions, are quite more significant tools to prevent the abuse of the legal public policy. The WTO case-law claims that, it needs to assess the anti-discrimination and anti-disguised restriction through substantively analyzing the purpose of concrete measures of the data location, i. e., reviewing substantial relation between the aforesaid purpose and the legal public policy, or working in the opposite. |