This study presents a hermeneutical analysis on the scientific character of pedagogy, with a view to promoting the formation of a sound and exact system of educational science.From a historical scrutinazation of the development of scientification of pedagogy it is found that the current empirico — analytical educational science misuses the principle of verification to the effect of advocating a methodological monism and finally dehumanizing educational studies. To rectify this mistake a hermenentical reflection on the educational scientific studies is essential.Originally hermeneutics means nothing but the interpretative techniques in the exegesis of ancient texts or the Scriptures. It was W. Dilthy, who first turned the focus to the study of Verstehen itself. Further through the elaboration of M. Heidegger, H. — G. Gadamer and J. Habermas etc. hermeneutics was elevated from the study of method to the transcendentallogical reflectin on the condition of Verstehen. The hermeneutical transformation has a great influence on social sciences, of course also on educational theories, esp. those of O.F. Bollnow, K. Mollenhauer and W.Klafki etc.However, “Verstenhen” is usually denounced as psychological “Einfühlen” and thus as lacking of scientific objectivity. This denunciation is owing to neglection of the fact that Verstehen in modern hermeneutics is carried out through a continuous dialogue and discussion in an ideal hermeneutic situation. Therefore, the objectivity of Verstehen is based on human communicative rationality.The foregoing argumentation follows that Verstehen is an essential methodological instrumentarium for the reflection of educational scientific studies and for the meditation of metatheoretical reconstruction of educational science. It is finally recommended that hermeneutical reflection on educational studies should be integrated into a harmonious scientific procedure in order to form a more sound and humanistic system of educational science. |