英文摘要 |
Since China's implementation of the Confucius Institute (CI) project in 2004, the link between teaching Chinese as a foreign language and the role of China on the international stage has grown in importance. This paper adopts the documentary analysis method. The study objectives are as follows: 1. To explore the global market development strategy, management mode and curriculum planning of the Confucius Institutes. 2. Analyze the problems faced by Confucius Institutes. 3. Explore the strategies that Confucius Institutes can use to improve in the future. These strategies can also be used as a reference for the future directions of Taiwan in promoting Taiwanese culture. This paper attempts to explore the predicaments of CIs, including: 1. unstable factors arising from the start-up model of China-foreign cooperation; 2. teachers mainly have short-term assignments, which is not conducive to the accumulation of teaching experience, and some teachers have insufficient teaching experience; 3. teachers teaching abroad face difficulties such as language barriers; 4. suspicion raised among foreign academics that CIs interfere with academic autonomy and freedom; 5. problems with the co-operation and management of foreign institutes; 6. concerns about the substantial and financial viability of Cis; and 7. some CIs face problems of sustainable development. In addition, in response to external criticism, the Ministry of Education of China changed the name of the Confucius Institute Headquarters to the "Center for Language Education and Cooperation" in 2020. The findings show that the CI project can be improved by: 1. learning from experience of cultural and language communication agencies in other countries; 2. strengthening young teachers' teaching skills and providing foreign language training; 3. assisting expatriate teachers in solving their problems; 4. improving the image of CIs and avoiding disputes that interfere with academic freedom; 5. establishing the principle of equality and reciprocity with foreign universities; 6. separating CI budgets from university budgets and turning to various funding sources; and 7. developing medium-term and long-term development plans and comprehensive evaluation models, and seeking sustainable development strategies. |