英文摘要 |
In order to evaluate civil servants accurately and objectively, the law makers promulgated the Act of Merit for Officers and Noncommissioned Officers of the Armed Forces, which rules the evaluating system of soldiers. Appraisal bonus and promotion, which the Constitution guarantees the people' s right to hold public offices, that encompasses the right of a public functionary to be appointed, promoted and transferred pursuant to law after taking his or her office, are determined by the Grades of Evaluation. The lawmakers authorized the Ministry of National Defense to establish legal orders, which determine the annual evaluation, the separate evaluation and the standard of award. The Ministry of National Defense established the Standards of Merit and Bonus for Officers and Noncommissioned Officers of the Armed Forces, for which the Volunteer Enlisted Soldiers shall apply mutat is mutandis. However, the Ministry of National Defense established the Directions Governing the Evaluation of the Volunteer Officers, Noncommissioned Officers and Enlisted Soldiers in addition, which contains the Limitations of Grades of Evaluation that the Act and the Standards do not contain. This research introduces the evolution of the evaluating system of soldiers as an administrative law, compares with the Civil Service Performance Evaluation Act, and surveys whether the Ministry of National Defense did above infringes soldiers' right to hold public offices by the Principle of Legal Reservation and other general principles of law, in order to protect the rights of soldiers by the Principle of Administration by Law and our constitutional state. |